HAZOP analysis

HAZOP (Hazard and Operability Study) analysis is a structured and systematic hazard identification technique that examines a process or installation node by node to detect deviations from the design intent (higher flow rate, lower pressure, high temperature, reverse flow, lack of reagent, contamination) by combining guide words with process parameters. It then analyzes the causes, consequences, existing safeguards, and necessary corrective actions. Developed in the chemical industry in the 1960s, it is standardized in IEC 61882 and is the reference technique for risk analyses of establishments affected by major accident regulations (Royal Decree 840/2015) and, more generally, for process safety.

In short

A systematic and team-based technique for identifying hazards and operability problems in processes and installations: it examines each node by applying guide words (no, more, less, reverse, different from) to process parameters to generate deviations, and analyzes causes, consequences, safeguards, and actions. Standardized in IEC 61882 and used in major accident risk analyses (Royal Decree 840/2015) and in process safety.

Content
  1. What is HAZOP analysis?
  2. Methodology
  3. Applications and variants
  4. Organizational application: how to perform a HAZOP
  5. Limits and common mistakes
  6. Practical example
  7. Regulatory and reference framework
  8. Related concepts
  9. References

A–Z dictionary →

What is HAZOP analysis?

An industrial process is designed with a specific intention: that each stream has a defined flow rate, pressure, temperature, and composition; that each piece of equipment operates under specific conditions; and that each sequence occurs in a specific order. Process accidents arise when reality deviates from this intention and safeguards fail to detect or correct the deviation in time. HAZOP is based on this idea: instead of openly asking what could go wrong, it systematically examines each part of the process, applying guide words (no, more, less, in addition to, part of, reverse, different from, before, after) to each relevant parameter (flow rate, pressure, temperature, level, composition, time, sequence) to generate plausible deviations.

For each deviation, the team identifies the possible causes (pump failure, closed valve, operating error, loss of service), the consequences of inaction (overpressure, toxic leak, runaway reaction, equipment damage), existing safeguards (alarms, interlocks, safety valves, procedures), and, when the remaining risk is unacceptable, recommendations for improvement. All of this is documented in worksheets that serve as evidence of the study and the basis for the action plan.

HAZOP is a qualitative, team-based technique: its value lies in the input of a multidisciplinary group (process, operations, maintenance, instrumentation, safety) guided by an experienced facilitator. It is applied in the design of new facilities, in modifications, in the periodic review of existing facilities, and as part of change management. It is complemented by quantitative techniques (fault tree analysis, layer of protection analysis) when safeguards need to be sized.

Methodology

  • Preparation. Definition of scope and objectives, collection of documentation (piping and instrumentation diagrams, data sheets, procedures), division of the process into nodes and selection of the team and facilitator.
  • Analysis sessions. For each node, description of the design intent, application of the guide words to each parameter, identification of causes, consequences and safeguards, risk assessment (often with a matrix) and formulation of recommendations.
  • Record. Worksheets with the traceability of each deviation, the team’s decisions and actions, numbered and assigned.
  • Report and follow-up. Final report with prioritized recommendations, the organization’s response to each (acceptance, alternative, or justification for rejection), implementation plan, and verification of closure.
  • Revalidation. Review of the study in response to modifications, incidents or after a period of time has elapsed (usually five years in facilities affected by serious accidents), and verification that the safeguards are still operational.

Applications and variants

  • Continuous and batch processes. Chemical, petrochemical, pharmaceutical, food, water treatment, and energy plants; in batch processes, sequence and time parameters are added.
  • Procedures and operations. HAZOP procedures for start-ups, shutdowns, cleaning and maintenance, analyzing each step.
  • Control and safety systems. Evaluation of safety instrumented systems and determination of safety integrity levels according to the IEC 61511 series, based on the identified scenarios.
  • Major accidents. Basis of the risk analyses required in the policy for the prevention of major accidents, the safety management system and the safety report of Royal Decree 840/2015.
  • Other related techniques include What-if, checklists, Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), Fault Tree Analysis, Layers of Protection Analysis (LOPA), and bow-tie analysis, which are combined according to the phase and level of detail.

Organizational application: how to perform a HAZOP

  1. Define the scope, timing (design, modification, revalidation) and objectives of the study, and appoint an experienced facilitator and a secretary.
  2. Gather up-to-date documentation (piping and instrumentation diagrams, balances, data sheets, procedures, incident history) and verify that it reflects the actual installation.
  3. Divide the process into manageable nodes and form a multidisciplinary team with guaranteed dedication during the sessions.
  4. Systematically apply the guide words to each parameter of each node, recording causes, consequences, safeguards, risk assessment, and recommendations.
  5. Issue the report, assign each recommendation to a responsible party with a deadline, and record the management’s response.
  6. Execute and verify the closure of actions, integrate them into change management and risk assessment, and inform representatives.
  7. Schedule periodic revalidation and after relevant modifications or incidents.

Preventive management software allows you to record HAZOP recommendations as actions with responsible party, deadline and evidence of closure, link them to the affected equipment and processes and plan the revalidations.

Limits and common mistakes

  1. Conducting the study with outdated documentation or without reflecting the modifications to the installation.
  2. Incomplete equipment, without operating or maintenance personnel, or without an independent and experienced facilitator.
  3. Excessively long sessions that degrade attention and the quality of analysis.
  4. Relying on safeguards that are not proven, maintained, or of the same nature as the cause (common dependency).
  5. Not finalizing the recommendations or verifying their effectiveness, turning HAZOP into a documentary exercise.
  6. Apply HAZOP to conventional occupational risks for which there are more suitable methods, or use it as the sole technique without quantification when the consequences are severe.

HAZOP requires specific training and experience in the process being analyzed; this sheet is for informational purposes only.

Practical example

Situation: A chemical formulation plant plans to install a new batch reactor with the addition of an exothermic reagent and jacket cooling.

  • Preparation. Team made up of process engineering, operation, maintenance, instrumentation and prevention, with an external facilitator; nodes: reagent loading, reaction, cooling and venting.
  • Deviation analyzed. In the cooling node, the guide word “no” applied to the jacket water flow: causes, pump failure or closed valve; consequence, out-of-control reaction with overpressure; existing safeguards, temperature alarm and safety valve.
  • Recommendations. Interlock that stops the addition of reagent due to high temperature or low cooling flow rate, with evaluation of the required integrity level, and emergency shutdown procedure.
  • Monitoring. Assigned actions with deadlines before commissioning, verification of the interlock installation and HAZOP revalidation after five years or in case of changes.

Regulatory and reference framework

The technique is internationally applicable; in Colombia, Decree 1072 of 2015 and the regulations on major accidents require the identification of process hazards in facilities with hazardous substances.

Related concepts

References

  1. International Electrotechnical Commission. IEC 61882:2016, Hazard and operability studies (HAZOP studies). Application guide. 2016. Official source
  2. Official State Gazette. Royal Decree 840/2015, of September 21, approving measures for the control of risks inherent in major accidents involving hazardous substances. 2015, current consolidated text. Official source
  3. Official State Gazette. Law 31/1995, of November 8, on Occupational Risk Prevention. 1995, current consolidated text. Official source
  4. European Union. Directive 2012/18/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances. Official source
  5. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. NTP 238: Hazard and operability analyses in process installations. 1990. Official source

Editorial information

Publication date: August 30, 2026 .

Editorial Manager: Sabentis Editorial Team .

Editorial review by Pablo Rodríguez LinkedIn

Executive Vice President of the ORP International Foundation and Chief Financial Officer of Sabentis.

Request a Demo

Discover all that Sabentis can do for your organization.

Try Sabentis

request a demo
stars 5
GetApp Software Advice Capterra